Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2026-08-13 Origin: Site
Heavy-duty paper machine rolls are the core components in the pressing section of paper machines. The journal – as the critical structure connecting the roll body to the bearings – continuously withstands radial compressive loads, alternating bending stresses, and torsional fatigue loads under high-speed rotation. Any quality issue with the journal – whether internal shrinkage cavities, inclusions, cracks, or insufficient surface hardness, or dimensional deviations – can lead to premature bearing failure, roll runout, or even catastrophic equipment accidents.
42CrMo (AISI 4140/4142) alloy steel, with its excellent hardenability, high strength, and good toughness, has become the mainstream material for heavy-duty paper machine roll journals. After a complete quenching and tempering heat treatment, 42CrMo alloy structural steel can achieve tensile strength above 900MPa, excellent hardenability, uniform mechanical properties across the wall thickness, and significantly improved alternating fatigue resistance, compression resistance, and bending resistance. However, the superiority of the material can only be transformed into product reliability through strict full-process quality control.
This article follows the typical process flow for forged journals – raw material → forging → heat treatment → rough machining → non-destructive testing → finishing → final inspection – systematically explaining the quality control points at each stage.
The 42CrMo steel ingot used for paper machine roll journals should be vacuum-degassed refined billet to ensure internal density and low gas content.
Control Item | Requirement | Test Method |
|---|---|---|
Chemical composition | Complies with 42CrMo standard (C, Si, Mn, Cr, Mo, etc.) | Optical Emission Spectrometer (OES) |
Harmful elements | S≤0.025%, P≤0.025% | Spectrometric analysis |
Macrostructure | No concentrated porosity, shrinkage cavities, or elongated inclusions | Macro-etch inspection |
Grain size | Meets standard requirements | Metallographic examination |
Each batch of ingot shall undergo spectrometric re-testing upon receipt, strictly limiting harmful impurities such as sulphur and phosphorus, and screening out ingots with inherent defects in advance.
Technical personnel calculate the cutting dimensions based on the final journal outer diameter and overall length, reserving adequate forging ratio and machining allowance. The overall forging ratio for conventional journal forgings is controlled at 4 or above; for heavy-duty applications, the forging ratio is increased to 4.5–6.
Sufficient plastic deformation is the key to breaking down coarse as-cast grains, welding internal micro-porosities, and bringing the matrix density close to the theoretical density.
Alloy steel has low thermal conductivity. Rapid heating causes excessive temperature differences between the outer and inner layers of the billet, leading to inconsistent deformation during forging and resulting in eccentricity and uneven wall thickness.
Key heating process points:
Low-temperature stage: Heating rate not exceeding 50°C/h below 600°C – fully release internal thermal stress
Medium-temperature stage: Ramp steadily to 850°C and hold for uniform soaking
High-temperature stage: Final heating to 1150°C–1200°C for the starting forging temperature
Soaking time: Calculated based on cross-section thickness – 1.5 hours per 100mm wall thickness
Final forging temperature: Strictly maintain the 820°C minimum
Infrared temperature monitoring throughout ensures the temperature difference between the outer and inner layers is controlled within 20°C, preventing both surface overheating and core under-heating.
The core principle of journal forging is multi-heat, small reductions, and progressive forming – rejecting the single-pass large-deformation forging mode.
Key forging sequence points:
Operation | Control Points | Quality Objective |
|---|---|---|
Upsetting | Maintain reduction of approximately 35% | Compacts central porosity, breaks up dendrites |
Piercing | Preheat punch, feed slowly and steadily | Prevents impact tearing of the hole wall |
Mandrel drawing | Divide into 6–12 light heats, reduction 8%–15% per pass | Wall thickness error ≤±0.5mm |
Finishing | Uniform rotation, symmetrical reduction on both sides | Ensures concentricity |
During forging, concentricity must be checked and calibrated continuously. Immediately after final forging, roundness straightening is performed to correct any minor eccentricity generated during forging.
Defect Type | Main Cause | Prevention Measures |
|---|---|---|
Laps | Excessive reduction, uneven billet temperature | FEA simulation to optimise reduction and number of heats |
Transgranular fracture | Forging temperature too high or too low | Strict control of start/end forging temperatures |
Eccentricity | Asymmetric reduction on both sides | Symmetrical forging, continuous concentricity calibration |
Surface cracks | Forging at too low a temperature, excessive deformation resistance | Maintain final forging temperature ≥820°C |
After forging, the journal still contains forging residual stress, coarse and uneven grain structure, and low surface hardness. Forging alone cannot meet the demands of long-term continuous production. Heat treatment is the critical process for adjusting the internal metallurgical structure, balancing strength and toughness, and extending journal service life.
42CrMo journals typically undergo quenching + high-temperature tempering (quenching and tempering).
Quenching process points:
Control Item | Parameter Range | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
Quenching temperature | 850–860°C | Ensures full austenitisation |
Soaking time | 2.5 hours per 100mm wall thickness | Ensures uniform austenitisation throughout |
Quenching medium | Agitated quenching oil with temperature control (interrupted oil cooling) | Avoids micro-cracking from water quenching |
Cooling method | Air cool after removal to reduce temperature gradient → immerse in oil bath with uniform cooling | Forms fine martensite on the surface |
Water quenching is not suitable for thick-walled 42CrMo journals – the severe temperature gradient can easily induce micro-cracks and distortion. Interrupted oil cooling produces a fine martensitic structure on the surface to improve hardness and wear resistance, while retaining adequate toughness in the core, achieving a balance between wear resistance and bending resistance.
High-temperature tempering process points:
Control Item | Parameter Range | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
Tempering temperature | 560–580°C | High-temperature tempering to obtain tempered sorbite |
Tempering timing | Within 2 hours after quenching completion | Prevents quenching stress from causing cracking |
Cooling method | Furnace cooling | Thoroughly eliminates structural and thermal stresses |
After quenching and tempering, the overall hardness of the journal stabilises at HB280–330, with tensile strength, yield strength, and impact toughness reaching a balanced state. Some studies indicate that a 860°C quenching + 640°C tempering heat treatment scheme can achieve the optimal combination of high strength and high toughness.
For orders requiring higher surface wear resistance, surface induction hardening of the outer diameter can be added on top of the overall quenching and tempering treatment:
Hardened layer depth: Up to 6mm
Surface hardness: Up to 55 HRC
Structural effect: Achieving "hard shell, tough core" – wear-resistant surface, impact-resistant core
Defect Type | Main Cause | Prevention Measures |
|---|---|---|
Quenching cracks | Insufficient tempering time, severe banded structure | Tempering time ≥5h, control banded structure ≤Grade 2 |
Non-uniform hardness | Uneven quenching cooling | Use agitated quenching oil for uniform cooling |
Distortion (ovality/bending) | Uneven heating/cooling | Vertical furnace loading, internal support tooling |
Internal cracking | Carbon segregation, inherent core defects | Strict raw material inspection |
Non-destructive testing is an indispensable step in the forged journal quality control system. It enables detection of internal defects before machining, preventing hidden defects from being carried into subsequent operations.
Ultrasonic testing is the primary method for detecting internal defects (shrinkage cavities, inclusions, porosity, cracks) in forged journals.
Control Item | Requirement | Reference Standard |
|---|---|---|
Test method | Manual pulse-echo method | EN 10228-3 |
Test coverage | 100% of critical cross-sections | Customer specification |
Acceptance criteria | Per design requirements | EN 10228-3 / ASTM A649 |
Personnel qualification | Certified NDT personnel | EN ISO 9712 |
EN 10228-3 specifies the techniques for manual pulse-echo ultrasonic testing of ferritic or martensitic steel forgings.
Magnetic particle testing is used to detect surface and near-surface defects (cracks, laps, seams, etc.) on the journal.
Control Item | Requirement | Reference Standard |
|---|---|---|
Test method | Segmented multi-directional magnetisation | ASTM E709 |
Test coverage | 100% of journal surface | — |
Test timing | After heat treatment, before finishing | — |
For journal forgings, 100% segmented multi-directional magnetisation should be performed after tempering to inspect for circumferential and longitudinal cracks.
In accordance with standards such as ASTM A649, Macrotech examination and Microcleanliness evaluation should also be performed.
The main purpose of rough machining is to remove the forged surface scale and most of the allowance, while exposing any potential defects.
Machining allowance: Reserved per procedure – typically 3–6mm per step
Datum establishment: Machining is performed using the journal centreline as the reference
Stress relief: Stress relief treatment after rough machining
Finishing is the final assurance of journal dimensional accuracy and surface quality.
Key dimensional control:
Control Item | Typical Requirement | Test Method |
|---|---|---|
Journal diameter | Per drawing tolerance | Micrometer / Air gauge |
Surface roughness | 0.16–0.63μm | Roughness tester |
Radial runout | ≤0.02mm | Dial indicator |
Concentricity | Per drawing requirement | Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) |
The surface roughness and runout of the finished journal directly affect bearing life and operational stability – excessive runout will cause vibration and accelerate bearing wear.
After finishing, hardness re-check is performed on the journal surface to verify the effectiveness of the heat treatment and ensure no surface damage was caused by the machining process. The hardness of quenched and tempered 42CrMo journals is typically controlled in the HB260–320 range.
Inspection Item | Content | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|
Dimensional inspection | Journal diameter, length, runout, concentricity | Drawing requirements |
Surface quality | No cracks, scratches, rust | Visual / MT |
Hardness check | Surface hardness | HB260–320 |
Mechanical properties | Tensile / impact (cast-with test bars) | Tensile ≥900MPa |
Complete delivery documentation is a reflection of professionalism:
Material certificate (chemical composition, mechanical properties)
Heat treatment curve records
NDT reports (UT/MT)
Dimensional inspection report
Hardness test report
3.1/3.2 certification (per customer requirements)
Stage | Core Control Points | Key Parameters / Standards |
|---|---|---|
Raw material | Chemical composition, macrostructure, forging ratio | Vacuum-degassed ingot, forging ratio ≥4 |
Forging | Stepwise heating, multi-heat progressive forging | Start forging 1150–1200°C, finish forging ≥820°C |
Heat treatment | Quenching and tempering | 850–860°C quenching + 560–580°C tempering |
NDT | UT (100%) + MT (100%) | EN 10228-3 / ASTM E709 |
Finishing | Dimensional accuracy, surface roughness, runout | Ra≤0.63μm, runout≤0.02mm |
Final inspection | Dimensions, hardness, mechanical properties | Tensile ≥900MPa, HB260–320 |
Quality control for heavy-duty paper machine roll 42CrMo journals cannot be guaranteed by a single stage of "high standards." It is a full-process systems engineering covering raw material, forging, heat treatment, non-destructive testing, and finishing.
Core principles:
Source control: Vacuum-degassed ingot + strict chemical composition control
Process control: Stepwise heating, multi-heat forging, precise quenching and tempering – every step executed to standard
Inspection verification: Dual NDT (UT + MT) to ensure both internal and surface quality
Precision assurance: Finishing with strict control of dimensions, roughness, and runout
When these five stages form a closed loop, the quality of 42CrMo forged journals ceases to be a gamble – it becomes a predictable, repeatable, and verifiable engineering capability. For high-value, high-risk rotating components such as paper machine rolls, this is the fundamental guarantee of long-term reliable equipment operation.
"The quality of a forged shaft begins with the ingot, is shaped by forging, refined by heat treatment, verified by NDT, and completed by finishing – every step is indispensable."
